Although Congress revised some of the more controversial PATRIOT Act provisions, one serious civil liberties concern remains: the National Security Letter (NSL).
The ACLU has challenged NSL provisions in court:
The provision permits the FBI to prohibit anyone who receives an NSL from disclosing that the FBI has sought or obtained information from them.
"The secrecy surrounding the FBI's use of national security letters is excessive and dangerous," said Jameel Jaffer, the ACLU lawyer who is lead counsel in the case. "By permitting the FBI to operate without meaningful public or judicial oversight, Congress has undermined important safeguards against abuse."
The ACLU filed the case in April 2004 on behalf of an Internet Service Provider that had received an NSL and was prohibited from disclosing that the FBI had sought information from it. In September 2004, the district court struck down the NSL provision as unconstitutional, with Judge Victor Marrero writing that "democracy abhors undue secrecy." In his landmark ruling, Judge Marrero held that indefinite gag orders imposed under the NSL law violate free speech rights protected by the First Amendment.
I will be watching the case closely, and will report on any future developments in the case.