...and It's McCain/Palin.
Monday September 1, 2008
Sarah Palin is hard to figure out as a candidate for several good reasons, one being that she has never served in a legislature and therefore lacks the record of binary "yea"/"nea" votes that have defined the three other candidates' civil liberties platform. We know Palin as two things: Mayor of a small Alaska town, and (for half a term) governor of the state. What we've learned about her during that time is limited, but not insignificant.
The good:
- She has a solid platform on gun rights. During the 2006 Alaska gubernatorial race, Palin was given an A+ rating by the National Rifle Association (NRA). This puts her far ahead not only her Democratic rivals, both of whom holds F ratings from the NRA, but also ahead of her running mate, who holds a mere C. Of the 2008 presidential primary candidates in both parties, only Bill Richardson held an A+ from the NRA.
- The fact that she has no legislative record gives her a certain amount of freedom to take civil libertarian positions on some issues, if she chooses to do so.
- To the extent that Palin does have an established record, it has been a record that represents the culturally conservative wing of the Republican Party. On abortion, for example, she is to the right of McCain; McCain favors overturning Roe v. Wade and leaving the matter to the states, while Palin supports an outright ban with no exceptions for rape, incest, or a woman's health. On gay rights, she not only supported her state's 1998 ban on same-sex marriage, but even spoke out against a 2006 state supreme court ruling awarding domestic partnership benefits to partners of gay state employees. She has also advocated the teaching of creationism in public schools.
- The fact that she has no legislative record gives her a certain amount of freedom to take authoritarian positions on other issues, if she chooses to do so.


Comments
McCain’s selection of Palin tells me nothing about his civil liberties agenda. All it tells me is that he makes impulsive decisions without the proper background checking and vetting.
On an unrelated Civil Liberties note, I find it very fascinating that Sarah Palin made a point of saying that it was her daughter’s choice to keep her baby. Does that mean that Sarah Palin’s daughter is allowed to have reproductive choices, but the rest of us are not?